Model Comparison

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen3 32B

Qwen3 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 1.5x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 32B is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, AIME 2025, LiveCodeBench).

Qwen3 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) costs less

For input processing, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) ($0.10/1M tokens) costs the same as Qwen3 32B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) ($0.10/1M tokens) is 3.0x cheaper than Qwen3 32B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 32B is more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.10
Best providerMistral
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

29.8B diff

Qwen3 32B has 29.8B more parameters than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512), making it 993.3% larger.

Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
3.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
32.8Bparameters
3.0B
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
32.8B
Qwen3 32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) accepts 131,100 input tokens compared to Qwen3 32B's 128,000 tokens. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) can generate longer responses up to 131,100 tokens, while Qwen3 32B is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Input131,100 tokens
Output131,100 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 32B does not.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) was released on 2025-12-04, while Qwen3 32B was released on 2025-04-29.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 7 months newer than Qwen3 32B.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Dec 4, 2025

4 months ago

7mo newer
Qwen3 32B

Apr 29, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is available from Mistral AI. Qwen3 32B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Sambanova.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M

Qwen3 32B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M
sambanova logo
Sambanova
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (131,100 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive output tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 32B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher AIME 2024 score (81.4% vs 77.5%)
Higher AIME 2025 score (72.9% vs 72.1%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (65.7% vs 54.8%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B

FAQ

Common questions about Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen3 32B

Qwen3 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is made by Mistral AI and Qwen3 32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) scores AIME 2024: 77.5%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 54.8%, GPQA: 53.4%. Qwen3 32B scores Arena Hard: 93.8%, AIME 2024: 81.4%, LiveBench: 74.9%, MultiLF: 73.0%, AIME 2025: 72.9%.
Both models cost $0.10 per million input tokens.
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 32B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (131K vs 128K), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is developed by Mistral AI and Qwen3 32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.