Model Comparison

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 13.5x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) costs less

For input processing, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B ($0.60/1M tokens) is 6.0x more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B ($3.60/1M tokens) is 36.0x more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) ($0.10/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$3.60
Best providerNovita
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.10
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

394.0B diff

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B has 394.0B more parameters than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512), making it 13133.3% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
397.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
3.0Bparameters
397.0B
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
3.0B
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)'s 131,100 tokens. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) can generate longer responses up to 131,100 tokens, while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Input262,144 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Input131,100 tokens
Output131,100 tokens
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B was released on 2026-02-16, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) was released on 2025-12-04.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is 2 months newer than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Feb 16, 2026

1 months ago

2mo newer
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Dec 4, 2025

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is available from Novita. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is available from Mistral AI.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.60/1M

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (88.4% vs 53.4%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores MMLU-Redux: 94.9%, HMMT 2025: 94.8%, C-Eval: 93.0%, HMMT25: 92.7%, IFEval: 92.6%. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) scores AIME 2024: 77.5%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 54.8%, GPQA: 53.4%.
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 6.0x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B costs $0.60/M input and $3.60/M output via novita. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output via mistral.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports 262K tokens and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (262K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.60 vs $0.10/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is developed by Mistral AI.