The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs QwQ-32B

QwQ-32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mistral AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while QwQ-32B is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, LiveCodeBench). QwQ-32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Choose QwQ-32B

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Context window
131,100
Released
Dec 2025
Mar 2025
License
Apache 2.0
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while QwQ-32B is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, LiveCodeBench).

QwQ-32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

29.5B diff

QwQ-32B has 29.5B more parameters than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512), making it 983.3% larger.

Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
3.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
32.5Bparameters
3.0B
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
32.5B
QwQ-32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) specifies input context (131,100 tokens). Only Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) specifies output context (131,100 tokens).

Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Input131,100 tokens
Output131,100 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) was released on 2025-12-04, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 9 months newer than QwQ-32B.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Dec 4, 2025

8 months ago

9mo newer
QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)'s cutoff date.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) or QwQ-32B?

QwQ-32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is made by Mistral AI and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) scores AIME 2024: 77.5%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 54.8%, GPQA: 53.4%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) and QwQ-32B?

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports 131K tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) and QwQ-32B?

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is developed by Mistral AI and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.