The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mistral AI · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, AIME 2025, LiveCodeBench), while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
3 of 4
1 of 4
Input price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Context window
262,100
Released
Dec 2025
Apr 2025
License
Apache 2.0
MIT

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, AIME 2025, LiveCodeBench), while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

6.0B diff

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has 6.0B more parameters than Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512), making it 75.0% larger.

Mistral AI
Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)
8.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
14.0Bparameters
8.0B
Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) specifies input context (262,100 tokens). Only Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) specifies output context (262,100 tokens).

Mistral AI
Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)
Input262,100 tokens
Output262,100 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning Plus does not.

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) was released on 2025-12-04, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus was released on 2025-04-30.

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) is 7 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)

Dec 4, 2025

8 months ago

7mo newer
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Apr 30, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning Plus's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)'s cutoff date.

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Mar 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Which is better, Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) or Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) is made by Mistral AI and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) compare to Phi 4 Reasoning Plus in benchmarks?

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) scores AIME 2024: 86.0%, AIME 2025: 78.7%, GPQA: 66.8%, LiveCodeBench: 61.6%. Phi 4 Reasoning Plus scores FlenQA: 97.9%, HumanEval+: 92.3%, IFEval: 84.9%, OmniMath: 81.9%, AIME 2024: 81.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) supports 262K tokens and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) is developed by Mistral AI and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is developed by Microsoft.