Model Comparison

Mistral Large 2 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Mistral Large 2 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Mistral Large 2 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (HumanEval, MMLU), while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (GSM8k).

Mistral Large 2 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Apr 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Apr 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 2
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$6.00
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

90.5B diff

Mistral Large 2 has 90.5B more parameters than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct, making it 278.5% larger.

Mistral AI
Mistral Large 2
123.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
32.5Bparameters
123.0B
Mistral Large 2
32.5B
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mistral Large 2 specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Mistral Large 2 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Mistral AI
Mistral Large 2
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Apr 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Mistral Large 2 is licensed under Mistral Research License, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Mistral Large 2

Mistral Research License

Open weights

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Mistral Large 2 was released on 2024-07-24, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is 2 months newer than Mistral Large 2.

Mistral Large 2

Jul 24, 2024

1.7 years ago

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Higher HumanEval score (92.0% vs 88.4%)
Higher MMLU score (84.0% vs 83.3%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher GSM8k score (95.9% vs 93.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Mistral Large 2 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Mistral Large 2 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Mistral Large 2 is made by Mistral AI and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Mistral Large 2 scores GSM8k: 93.0%, HumanEval: 92.0%, MT-Bench: 86.3%, MMLU: 84.0%, MMLU French: 82.8%. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.9%, HumanEval: 88.4%, HellaSwag: 85.2%, BBH: 84.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.
Mistral Large 2 supports 128K tokens and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Mistral Research License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Mistral Large 2 is developed by Mistral AI and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.