Model Comparison
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct has a slight edge in benchmark performance.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct has a slight edge in benchmark performance.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct has 0.0B more parameters than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base, making it 0.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Both models were released on 2025-03-17.
They likely represent similar generations of model development.
Mar 17, 2025
1.2 years ago
Mar 17, 2025
1.2 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
View detailsMistral AI
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct.