Model Comparison
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base vs Muse Spark 1.1Which is better in 2026?
Comparing Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base and Muse Spark 1.1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Verdict: Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base vs Muse Spark 1.1 — which is better?
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base (by Mistral AI) and Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
On price, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is roughly 13.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Muse Spark 1.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base if…
- cost matters — it's about 13.3x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base and Muse Spark 1.1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base ($0.10/1M tokens) is 12.5x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens).
For output processing, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base ($0.30/1M tokens) is 14.2x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.1 is more expensive than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Muse Spark 1.1 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base's 128,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is limited to 128,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base and Muse Spark 1.1 support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Muse Spark 1.1
License
Usage and distribution terms
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Muse Spark 1.1 uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base was released on 2025-03-17, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.
Muse Spark 1.1 is 16 months newer than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base.
Mar 17, 2025
1.3 years ago
Jul 9, 2026
1 weeks ago
1.3yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is available from Mistral AI. Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API.
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Muse Spark 1.1
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
View detailsMistral AI
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base vs Muse Spark 1.1.