Model Comparison

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base vs Qwen3 VL 32B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking — which is better?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base (by Mistral AI) and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, MMLU-Pro). Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Jul 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

9.0B diff

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has 9.0B more parameters than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base, making it 37.5% larger.

Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
24.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
33.0Bparameters
24.0B
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Jul 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base was released on 2025-03-17, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is 6 months newer than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Mar 17, 2025

1.3 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

10 months ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher GPQA score (73.1% vs 37.5%)
Higher MMLU score (88.7% vs 81.0%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (82.1% vs 56.0%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Which is better, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is made by Mistral AI and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking in benchmarks?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base scores MMLU: 81.0%, TriviaQA: 80.5%, MMMU: 59.3%, MMLU-Pro: 56.0%, GPQA: 37.5%. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is developed by Mistral AI and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.