Model Comparison

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking — which is better?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct (by Mistral AI) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is better at 3 benchmarks (MMLU, MMLU-Pro, SimpleQA). Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct if…

  • you are already invested in the Mistral AI ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is better at 3 benchmarks (MMLU, MMLU-Pro, SimpleQA).

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

212.0B diff

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking has 212.0B more parameters than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct, making it 883.3% larger.

Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
24.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
236.0Bparameters
24.0B
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
236.0B
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was released on 2025-03-17, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 6 months newer than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct

Mar 17, 2025

1.2 years ago

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Higher MMLU score (90.6% vs 80.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (83.8% vs 66.8%)
Higher SimpleQA score (44.4% vs 10.4%)

Detailed Comparison

FAQ

Common questions about Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

Which is better, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is made by Mistral AI and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct compare to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking in benchmarks?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct scores HumanEval: 88.4%, MMLU: 80.6%, TriviaQA: 80.5%, MBPP: 74.7%, MATH: 69.3%. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking scores ZebraLogic: 97.3%, DocVQAtest: 96.5%, ScreenSpot: 95.4%, CountBench: 93.7%, MMLU-Redux: 93.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is developed by Mistral AI and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.