The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Glimmer-30B vs Qwen3.7-Plus

Qwen3.7-Plus leads the LLM Stats Score 43.3 to 35.5.

Meta · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.7-Plus leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.3 to 35.5, ranking #36 overall.

In the 13 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.7-Plus wins 12; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Glimmer-30B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Qwen3.7-Plus

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.3 and ranks #36 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 12 of 13 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Muse Glimmer-30B
Meta
Qwen3.7-Plus
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
35.5
#76
43.3
#36
Reasoning
34.7
#77
43.6
#33
Coding
23.8
#65
32.5
#41
Agents
18.5
#63
26.1
#39
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 13
12 of 13
Input price
— / M
$0.32 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.28 / M
Context window
—
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
Muse Glimmer-30B
Qwen3.7-Plus
Math
28.3#84
39.7#16
Vision
20.4#61
32.8#17
Tool use
18.6#59
24.3#33
Multimodal
23.2#47
35.2#9
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

25 reported for Muse Glimmer-30B · 70 for Qwen3.7-Plus

13 shared

Muse Glimmer-30B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MCP Atlas), while Qwen3.7-Plus is better at 12 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, IFBench, MMMU-Pro, OmniDocBench 1.5, OSWorld-Verified, SciCode, ScreenSpot Pro, SkillsBench, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified).

Qwen3.7-Plus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.7-Plus specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Qwen3.7-Plus specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Meta
Muse Glimmer-30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Muse Glimmer-30B and Qwen3.7-Plus support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Glimmer-30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.7-Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Glimmer-30B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Qwen3.7-Plus uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Glimmer-30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.7-Plus

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Glimmer-30B was released on 2026-08-10, while Qwen3.7-Plus was released on 2026-05-31.

Muse Glimmer-30B is 2 months newer than Qwen3.7-Plus.

Muse Glimmer-30B

Aug 10, 2026

2 weeks ago

2mo newer
Qwen3.7-Plus

May 31, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Muse Glimmer-30B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-04, while Qwen3.7-Plus's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Muse Glimmer-30B's training data extends to 2026-01-04, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.7-Plus's cutoff date.

Muse Glimmer-30B

Jan 2026

Qwen3.7-Plus

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Glimmer-30B and Qwen3.7-Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Glimmer-30B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.7-Plus
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Glimmer-30B vs Qwen3.7-Plus.

Which is better, Muse Glimmer-30B or Qwen3.7-Plus?

Qwen3.7-Plus leads the LLM Stats Score 43.3 to 35.5. Muse Glimmer-30B is made by Meta and Qwen3.7-Plus is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Glimmer-30B compare to Qwen3.7-Plus in benchmarks?

Muse Glimmer-30B scores AIME 2026: 94.7%, Siren AgentDojo Utility: 94.2%, GPQA: 83.5%, AA-LCR: 80.0%, CharXiv-R: 78.8%. Qwen3.7-Plus scores IFEval: 94.6%, MMLU-Redux: 94.5%, HMMT Feb 26: 92.9%, MRCR v2: 91.7%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Glimmer-30B and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Muse Glimmer-30B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.7-Plus supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Glimmer-30B and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (35.5 vs 43.3), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Glimmer-30B and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Muse Glimmer-30B is developed by Meta and Qwen3.7-Plus is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons