Model Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Nova MicroWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing Muse Spark 1.1 and Nova Micro across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Nova Micro — which is better?

Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) and Nova Micro (by Amazon) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Nova Micro is roughly 34.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark 1.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Nova Micro if…

  • cost matters — it's about 34.8x cheaper per token

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Muse Spark 1.1 and Nova Microdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nova Micro costs less

For input processing, Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens) is 41.7x more expensive than Nova Micro ($0.03/1M tokens).

For output processing, Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens) is 30.4x more expensive than Nova Micro ($0.14/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.1 is more expensive than Nova Micro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerMeta
Amazon
Nova Micro
Input tokens$0.03
Output tokens$0.14
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark 1.1 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Nova Micro's 128,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Nova Micro is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Amazon
Nova Micro
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Muse Spark 1.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nova Micro does not.

Muse Spark 1.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Micro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Nova Micro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09, while Nova Micro was released on 2024-11-20.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 20 months newer than Nova Micro.

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.6yr newer
Nova Micro

Nov 20, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API. Nova Micro is available from Bedrock.

Muse Spark 1.1

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M

Nova Micro

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.03/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.14/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Meta
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Amazon
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Spark 1.1 and Nova Micro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Spark 1.1
✓ Preferred
Nova Micro
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Amazon
Nova Micro

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Spark 1.1 vs Nova Micro.

Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or Nova Micro?

Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta) and Nova Micro (Amazon) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Muse Spark 1.1 compare to Nova Micro in benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%. Nova Micro scores GSM8k: 92.3%, ARC-C: 90.2%, Translation Set1→en COMET22: 88.7%, Translation en→Set1 COMET22: 88.5%, IFEval: 87.2%.

Is Muse Spark 1.1 cheaper than Nova Micro?

Nova Micro is 41.7x cheaper for input tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via meta. Nova Micro costs $0.03/M input and $0.14/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Spark 1.1 and Nova Micro?

Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Nova Micro supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Spark 1.1 and Nova Micro?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($1.25 vs $0.03/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Spark 1.1 and Nova Micro?

Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta and Nova Micro is developed by Amazon.

Related comparisons