Model Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Nova ProWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing Muse Spark 1.1 and Nova Pro across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Nova Pro — which is better?

Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) and Nova Pro (by Amazon) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Nova Pro is roughly 1.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark 1.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Nova Pro if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.4x cheaper per token

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Muse Spark 1.1 and Nova Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nova Pro costs less

For input processing, Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens) is 1.6x more expensive than Nova Pro ($0.80/1M tokens).

For output processing, Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Nova Pro ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.1 is more expensive than Nova Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Jul 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerMeta
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark 1.1 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Nova Pro's 300,000 tokens. Nova Pro can generate longer responses up to 300,000 tokens, while Muse Spark 1.1 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Mon Jul 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Muse Spark 1.1 and Nova Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Nova Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 20 months newer than Nova Pro.

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.6yr newer
Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API. Nova Pro is available from Bedrock.

Muse Spark 1.1

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M

Nova Pro

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Meta
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Amazon
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Spark 1.1 and Nova Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Spark 1.1
✓ Preferred
Nova Pro
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Amazon
Nova Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Spark 1.1 vs Nova Pro.

Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or Nova Pro?

Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta) and Nova Pro (Amazon) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Muse Spark 1.1 compare to Nova Pro in benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%. Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%.

Is Muse Spark 1.1 cheaper than Nova Pro?

Nova Pro is 1.6x cheaper for input tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via meta. Nova Pro costs $0.80/M input and $3.20/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Spark 1.1 and Nova Pro?

Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Nova Pro supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Spark 1.1 and Nova Pro?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 300K), input pricing ($1.25 vs $0.80/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Spark 1.1 and Nova Pro?

Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta and Nova Pro is developed by Amazon.

Related comparisons