Model Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3 VL 32B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct — which is better?

Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Muse Spark 1.1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (CharXiv-R), while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Muse Spark 1.1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (CharXiv-R), while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jul 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark 1.1 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark 1.1 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Jul 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Spark 1.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 10 months newer than Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 weeks ago

9mo newer
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Meta
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Higher CharXiv-R score (88.4% vs 62.8%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Spark 1.1
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.1 is made by Meta and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Muse Spark 1.1 compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons