Model Comparison
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Phi 4 Reasoning is better at 0 benchmarks.
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has 18.0B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning, making it 128.6% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) specifies output context (262,144 tokens).
License
Usage and distribution terms
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is licensed under NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement , while Phi 4 Reasoning uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) was released on 2025-12-15, while Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 8 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning.
Dec 15, 2025
5 months ago
7mo newerApr 30, 2025
1.1 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-11-28, while Phi 4 Reasoning has a cutoff of 2025-03-01.
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has more recent training data (up to 2025-11-28), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Phi 4 Reasoning (2025-03-01).
Nov 2025
8 mo newerMar 2025
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Phi 4 Reasoning
View detailsMicrosoft
No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) vs Phi 4 Reasoning.