The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) vs Qwen3.8-27B

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, LiveCodeBench v6). Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.06/M input and $0.24/M output

Choose Qwen3.8-27B

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
$0.06 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.24 / M
— / M
Context window
262,144
Released
Dec 2025
Aug 2026
License
NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, LiveCodeBench v6).

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

4.2B diff

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has 4.2B more parameters than Qwen3.8-27B, making it 15.2% larger.

NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
32.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
27.8Bparameters
32.0B
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
27.8B
Qwen3.8-27B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.8-27B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) does not.

Qwen3.8-27B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is licensed under NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement , while Qwen3.8-27B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Qwen3.8-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) was released on 2025-12-15, while Qwen3.8-27B was released on 2026-08-14.

Qwen3.8-27B is 8 months newer than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Dec 15, 2025

8 months ago

Qwen3.8-27B

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-11-28, while Qwen3.8-27B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s training data extends to 2025-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.8-27B's cutoff date.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Nov 2025

Qwen3.8-27B

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) and Qwen3.8-27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-27B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) vs Qwen3.8-27B.

Which is better, Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) or Qwen3.8-27B?

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is made by NVIDIA and Qwen3.8-27B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) compare to Qwen3.8-27B in benchmarks?

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) scores AIME 2025: 99.2%, WMT24++: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 78.3%, GPQA: 75.0%, LiveCodeBench v6: 68.3%. Qwen3.8-27B scores MathVision: 94.6%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 90.3%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, GPQA: 89.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) and Qwen3.8-27B?

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) supports 262K tokens and Qwen3.8-27B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) and Qwen3.8-27B?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) and Qwen3.8-27B?

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen3.8-27B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.