Model Comparison

North Mini Code 1.0 vs Gemini 3.5 FlashWhich is better in 2026?

Gemini 3.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: North Mini Code 1.0 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash — which is better?

North Mini Code 1.0 (by Cohere) and Gemini 3.5 Flash (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

North Mini Code 1.0 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 3.5 Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.0). Gemini 3.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose North Mini Code 1.0 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

North Mini Code 1.0 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 3.5 Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.0).

Gemini 3.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.5 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Cohere
North Mini Code 1.0
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas North Mini Code 1.0 does not.

Gemini 3.5 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

North Mini Code 1.0

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

North Mini Code 1.0 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Gemini 3.5 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

North Mini Code 1.0

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

North Mini Code 1.0 was released on 2026-06-09, while Gemini 3.5 Flash was released on 2026-05-19.

North Mini Code 1.0 is 1 month newer than Gemini 3.5 Flash.

North Mini Code 1.0

Jun 9, 2026

1 months ago

3w newer
Gemini 3.5 Flash

May 19, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-31, while North Mini Code 1.0's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.5 Flash's training data extends to 2026-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without North Mini Code 1.0's cutoff date.

North Mini Code 1.0

—

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Jan 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Cohere
Has open weights
Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (55.1% vs 40.2%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (76.2% vs 36.0%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against North Mini Code 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

North Mini Code 1.0
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
North Mini Code 1.0
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash

FAQ

Common questions about North Mini Code 1.0 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash.

Which is better, North Mini Code 1.0 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. North Mini Code 1.0 is made by Cohere and Gemini 3.5 Flash is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does North Mini Code 1.0 compare to Gemini 3.5 Flash in benchmarks?

North Mini Code 1.0 scores LiveCodeBench v6: 70.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 67.6%, SWE-Bench Pro: 40.2%, SciCode: 38.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 36.0%. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores CharXiv-R: 84.2%, MCP Atlas: 83.6%, MMMU-Pro: 83.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 78.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 76.2%.

What are the context window sizes for North Mini Code 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Flash?

North Mini Code 1.0 supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemini 3.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between North Mini Code 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes North Mini Code 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Flash?

North Mini Code 1.0 is developed by Cohere and Gemini 3.5 Flash is developed by Google.

Related comparisons