Model Comparison

Nova Lite vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Nova Lite is 3.8x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Nova Lite outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, LVBench, MMLU).

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sun May 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nova Lite costs less

For input processing, Nova Lite ($0.06/1M tokens) is 3.3x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Nova Lite ($0.24/1M tokens) is 4.1x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.99/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is more expensive than Nova Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sun May 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Nova Lite

Input tokens$0.06

Output tokens$0.24

Best providerAWS Bedrock

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Input tokens$0.20

Output tokens$0.99

Best providerNovita

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Nova Lite accepts 300,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking can generate longer responses up to 32,768 tokens, while Nova Lite is limited to 2,048 tokens.

Nova Lite

Input300,000 tokens

Output2,048 tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Input131,072 tokens

Output32,768 tokens

Sun May 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Nova Lite and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Nova Lite

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nova Lite is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nova Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nova Lite was released on 2024-11-20, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 10 months newer than Nova Lite.

Nova Lite

Nov 20, 2024

1.5 years ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

7 months ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Nova Lite is available from Bedrock. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is available from Novita, DeepInfra.

Nova Lite

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.24/1M

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.29/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.99/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Nova Lite

View details

Amazon

Larger context window (300,000 tokens)

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Higher IFEval score (89.7% vs 81.7%)

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Higher GPQA score (74.4% vs 42.0%)

Higher LVBench score (59.2% vs 40.4%)

Higher MMLU score (87.6% vs 80.5%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Nova Lite	Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Nova Lite vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

Which is better, Nova Lite or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Nova Lite is made by Amazon and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Nova Lite compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking in benchmarks?

Nova Lite scores GSM8k: 94.5%, ARC-C: 92.4%, DocVQA: 92.4%, IFEval: 89.7%, Translation en→Set1 COMET22: 88.8%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, MMLU-Redux: 90.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.6%.

Is Nova Lite cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Nova Lite is 3.3x cheaper for input tokens. Nova Lite costs $0.06/M input and $0.24/M output via bedrock. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs $0.20/M input and $0.99/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Nova Lite and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Nova Lite supports 300K tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nova Lite and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Key differences include context window (300K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.06 vs $0.20/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nova Lite and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Nova Lite is developed by Amazon and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.