Model Comparison

Nova Micro vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Nova Micro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (ARC-C), while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is better at 6 benchmarks (BBH, GPQA, GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU).

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com
Amazon
Nova Micro
Input tokens$0.03
Output tokens$0.14
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nova Micro specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Nova Micro specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Amazon
Nova Micro
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nova Micro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nova Micro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nova Micro was released on 2024-11-20, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Nova Micro is 2 months newer than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Nova Micro

Nov 20, 2024

1.4 years ago

2mo newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Amazon
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Higher ARC-C score (90.2% vs 70.4%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights
Higher BBH score (84.5% vs 79.5%)
Higher GPQA score (49.5% vs 40.0%)
Higher GSM8k score (95.9% vs 92.3%)
Higher HumanEval score (88.4% vs 81.1%)
Higher MATH score (83.1% vs 69.3%)
Higher MMLU score (83.3% vs 77.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Amazon
Nova Micro
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Nova Micro vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nova Micro is made by Amazon and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Nova Micro scores GSM8k: 92.3%, ARC-C: 90.2%, Translation Set1→en COMET22: 88.7%, Translation en→Set1 COMET22: 88.5%, IFEval: 87.2%. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.9%, HumanEval: 88.4%, HellaSwag: 85.2%, BBH: 84.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.
Nova Micro supports 128K tokens and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Nova Micro is developed by Amazon and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.