Model Comparison

Nova Micro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nova Micro is 21.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Nova Micro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (IFEval, MMLU).

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun May 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nova Micro costs less

For input processing, Nova Micro ($0.03/1M tokens) is 15.0x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ($0.45/1M tokens).

For output processing, Nova Micro ($0.14/1M tokens) is 24.9x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ($3.49/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is more expensive than Nova Micro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sun May 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Nova Micro

Input tokens$0.03

Output tokens$0.14

Best providerAWS Bedrock

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Input tokens$0.45

Output tokens$3.49

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Nova Micro's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Nova Micro is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Nova Micro

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Input262,144 tokens

Output262,144 tokens

Sun May 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nova Micro does not.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Nova Micro

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nova Micro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nova Micro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nova Micro was released on 2024-11-20, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 10 months newer than Nova Micro.

Nova Micro

Nov 20, 2024

1.5 years ago

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Nova Micro is available from Bedrock. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is available from DeepInfra, Novita.

Nova Micro

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $0.03/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.14/1M

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.45/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.49/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.98/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.95/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Nova Micro

View details

Amazon

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Has open weights

Higher IFEval score (88.2% vs 87.2%)

Higher MMLU score (90.6% vs 77.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Nova Micro	Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Nova Micro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

Which is better, Nova Micro or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nova Micro is made by Amazon and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Nova Micro compare to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking in benchmarks?

Nova Micro scores GSM8k: 92.3%, ARC-C: 90.2%, Translation Set1→en COMET22: 88.7%, Translation en→Set1 COMET22: 88.5%, IFEval: 87.2%. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking scores ZebraLogic: 97.3%, DocVQAtest: 96.5%, ScreenSpot: 95.4%, CountBench: 93.7%, MMLU-Redux: 93.7%.

Is Nova Micro cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Nova Micro is 15.0x cheaper for input tokens. Nova Micro costs $0.03/M input and $0.14/M output via bedrock. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking costs $0.45/M input and $3.49/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Nova Micro and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Nova Micro supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nova Micro and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 262K), input pricing ($0.03 vs $0.45/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nova Micro and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Nova Micro is developed by Amazon and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.