Model Comparison
Nova Micro vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Nova Micro is 6.9x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Nova Micro vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking — which is better?
Nova Micro (by Amazon) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Nova Micro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU). Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
On price, Nova Micro is roughly 6.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Nova Micro if…
- cost matters — it's about 6.9x cheaper per token
Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Nova Micro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU).
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Nova Micro ($0.03/1M tokens) is 6.7x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.20/1M tokens).
For output processing, Nova Micro ($0.14/1M tokens) is 7.1x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.99/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is more expensive than Nova Micro.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Nova Micro's 128,000 tokens. Nova Micro can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is limited to 32,768 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nova Micro does not.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Nova Micro
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
License
Usage and distribution terms
Nova Micro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Nova Micro was released on 2024-11-20, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 10 months newer than Nova Micro.
Nov 20, 2024
1.6 years ago
Sep 22, 2025
9 months ago
10mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Nova Micro is available from Bedrock. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is available from Novita, DeepInfra.
Nova Micro
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Nova Micro
View detailsAmazon
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Nova Micro and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Nova Micro vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.