Model Comparison

Nova Micro vs Qwen3 VL 32B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Nova Micro vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking — which is better?

Nova Micro (by Amazon) and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Nova Micro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMLU). Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Nova Micro if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.03/M input and $0.14/M output

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Nova Micro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMLU).

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nova Micro specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Nova Micro specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Amazon
Nova Micro
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Jun 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nova Micro does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Nova Micro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nova Micro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nova Micro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nova Micro was released on 2024-11-20, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is 10 months newer than Nova Micro.

Nova Micro

Nov 20, 2024

1.6 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

9 months ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Amazon
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (73.1% vs 40.0%)
Higher IFEval score (87.8% vs 87.2%)
Higher MMLU score (88.7% vs 77.6%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nova Micro and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nova Micro
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Amazon
Nova Micro
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Nova Micro vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Which is better, Nova Micro or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nova Micro is made by Amazon and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Nova Micro compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking in benchmarks?

Nova Micro scores GSM8k: 92.3%, ARC-C: 90.2%, Translation Set1→en COMET22: 88.7%, Translation en→Set1 COMET22: 88.5%, IFEval: 87.2%. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Nova Micro and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Nova Micro supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nova Micro and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nova Micro and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Nova Micro is developed by Amazon and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons