The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Nova Pro vs Qwen3.8-27B

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Amazon · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nova Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nova Pro

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.80/M input and $3.20/M output

Choose Qwen3.8-27B

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.80 / M
— / M
Output price
$3.20 / M
— / M
Context window
300,000
Released
Nov 2024
Aug 2026
License
Proprietary
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Nova Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nova Pro specifies input context (300,000 tokens). Only Nova Pro specifies output context (300,000 tokens).

Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Nova Pro and Qwen3.8-27B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nova Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.8-27B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nova Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.8-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20, while Qwen3.8-27B was released on 2026-08-14.

Qwen3.8-27B is 21 months newer than Nova Pro.

Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.8 years ago

Qwen3.8-27B

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.7yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nova Pro and Qwen3.8-27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nova Pro
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-27B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nova Pro vs Qwen3.8-27B.

Which is better, Nova Pro or Qwen3.8-27B?

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nova Pro is made by Amazon and Qwen3.8-27B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Nova Pro compare to Qwen3.8-27B in benchmarks?

Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%. Qwen3.8-27B scores MathVision: 94.6%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 90.3%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, GPQA: 89.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Nova Pro and Qwen3.8-27B?

Nova Pro supports 300K tokens and Qwen3.8-27B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nova Pro and Qwen3.8-27B?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nova Pro and Qwen3.8-27B?

Nova Pro is developed by Amazon and Qwen3.8-27B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.