o1 vs Claude 3.5 Haiku Comparison
Comparing o1 and Claude 3.5 Haiku across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
o1 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MGSM, SWE-Bench Verified, TAU-bench Airline, TAU-bench Retail), while Claude 3.5 Haiku is better at 0 benchmarks.
o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, o1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 18.8x more expensive than Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens).
For output processing, o1 ($60.00/1M tokens) is 15.0x more expensive than Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, o1 is more expensive than Claude 3.5 Haiku.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 200,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while o1 is limited to 100,000 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
o1 was released on 2024-12-17, while Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22.
o1 is 2 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.
Dec 17, 2024
1.2 years ago
1mo newerOct 22, 2024
1.4 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
o1 is available from Azure, OpenAI. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.
o1
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
o1
View detailsOpenAI
Claude 3.5 Haiku
View detailsAnthropic
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|