Model Comparison

o1 vs Command R+Which is better in 2026?

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command R+ is 60.0x cheaper per token.

Verdict: o1 vs Command R+ — which is better?

o1 (by OpenAI) and Command R+ (by Cohere) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

o1 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GSM8k, MMLU), while Command R+ is better at 0 benchmarks. o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Command R+ is roughly 60.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

o1 also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose o1 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024

Choose Command R+ if…

  • cost matters — it's about 60.0x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

o1 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GSM8k, MMLU), while Command R+ is better at 0 benchmarks.

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Command R+ costs less

For input processing, o1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 60.0x more expensive than Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, o1 ($60.00/1M tokens) is 60.0x more expensive than Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o1 is more expensive than Command R+.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Jul 10 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
o1
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

o1 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Command R+'s 128,000 tokens. Command R+ can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while o1 is limited to 100,000 tokens.

OpenAI
o1
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Fri Jul 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

o1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Command R+ uses CC BY-NC.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o1

Proprietary

Closed source

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o1 was released on 2024-12-17, while Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30.

o1 is 4 months newer than Command R+.

o1

Dec 17, 2024

1.6 years ago

3mo newer
Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

o1 is available from Azure, OpenAI. Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock.

o1

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M

Command R+

cohere logo
Cohere
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher GSM8k score (97.1% vs 70.7%)
Higher MMLU score (91.8% vs 75.7%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against o1 and Command R+ side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

o1
✓ Preferred
Command R+
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
o1
Cohere
Command R+

FAQ

Common questions about o1 vs Command R+.

Which is better, o1 or Command R+?

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. o1 is made by OpenAI and Command R+ is made by Cohere. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does o1 compare to Command R+ in benchmarks?

o1 scores GSM8k: 97.1%, MATH: 96.4%, GPQA Physics: 92.8%, MMLU: 91.8%, MGSM: 89.3%. Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%.

Is o1 cheaper than Command R+?

Command R+ is 60.0x cheaper for input tokens. o1 costs $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output via azure. Command R+ costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via cohere.

What are the context window sizes for o1 and Command R+?

o1 supports 200K tokens and Command R+ supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o1 and Command R+?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.25/M), licensing (Proprietary vs CC BY-NC). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes o1 and Command R+?

o1 is developed by OpenAI and Command R+ is developed by Cohere.