Model Comparison

o1 vs Gemma 2 9B

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

o1 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU), while Gemma 2 9B is better at 0 benchmarks.

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
o1
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
Google
Gemma 2 9B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o1 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o1 specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

OpenAI
o1
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 2 9B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Apr 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

o1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 2 9B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o1

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 2 9B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o1 was released on 2024-12-17, while Gemma 2 9B was released on 2024-06-27.

o1 is 6 months newer than Gemma 2 9B.

o1

Dec 17, 2024

1.3 years ago

5mo newer
Gemma 2 9B

Jun 27, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher GSM8k score (97.1% vs 68.6%)
Higher HumanEval score (88.1% vs 40.2%)
Higher MATH score (96.4% vs 36.6%)
Higher MMLU score (91.8% vs 71.3%)
Google
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
o1
Google
Gemma 2 9B

FAQ

Common questions about o1 vs Gemma 2 9B

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. o1 is made by OpenAI and Gemma 2 9B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
o1 scores GSM8k: 97.1%, MATH: 96.4%, GPQA Physics: 92.8%, MMLU: 91.8%, MGSM: 89.3%. Gemma 2 9B scores ARC-E: 88.0%, BoolQ: 84.2%, HellaSwag: 81.9%, PIQA: 81.7%, Winogrande: 80.6%.
o1 supports 200K tokens and Gemma 2 9B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
o1 is developed by OpenAI and Gemma 2 9B is developed by Google.