Model Comparison

o1 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)Which is better in 2026?

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: o1 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) — which is better?

o1 (by OpenAI) and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

o1 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MGSM, MMLU), while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is better at 0 benchmarks. o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose o1 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

o1 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MGSM, MMLU), while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is better at 0 benchmarks.

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o1 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o1 specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

OpenAI
o1
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Jul 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1 does not.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

o1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

o1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o1

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o1 was released on 2024-12-17, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is 5 months newer than o1.

o1

Dec 17, 2024

1.6 years ago

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.1 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while o1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)'s training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without o1's cutoff date.

o1

—

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (78.0% vs 24.8%)
Higher HumanEval score (88.1% vs 66.5%)
Higher MGSM score (89.3% vs 53.1%)
Higher MMLU score (91.8% vs 60.1%)
Google
Supports multimodal inputs
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against o1 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

o1
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
o1
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

FAQ

Common questions about o1 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview).

Which is better, o1 or Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. o1 is made by OpenAI and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does o1 compare to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) in benchmarks?

o1 scores GSM8k: 97.1%, MATH: 96.4%, GPQA Physics: 92.8%, MMLU: 91.8%, MGSM: 89.3%. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%.

What are the context window sizes for o1 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

o1 supports 200K tokens and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o1 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes o1 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

o1 is developed by OpenAI and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google.

Related comparisons