o1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Comparison

Comparing o1 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

o1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMMLU), while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMU, SWE-Bench Verified).

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs less

For input processing, o1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 37.5x more expensive than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ($0.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, o1 ($60.00/1M tokens) is 18.8x more expensive than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o1 is more expensive than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
o1
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to o1's 200,000 tokens. o1 can generate longer responses up to 100,000 tokens, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is limited to 64,000 tokens.

OpenAI
o1
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Input262,144 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1 does not.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

o1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

o1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o1

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o1 was released on 2024-12-17, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B was released on 2026-02-24.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is 14 months newer than o1.

o1

Dec 17, 2024

1.2 years ago

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Feb 24, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

o1 is available from Azure, OpenAI. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is available from Novita. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

o1

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher MMMLU score (87.7% vs 86.7%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (86.6% vs 78.0%)
Higher MMMU score (83.9% vs 77.6%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (72.0% vs 41.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
o1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B