o1 vs Sarvam-30B Comparison

Comparing o1 and Sarvam-30B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

o1 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, SWE-Bench Verified), while Sarvam-30B is better at 1 benchmark (HumanEval).

o1 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
o1
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-30B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o1 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o1 specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

OpenAI
o1
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

o1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Sarvam-30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o1

Proprietary

Closed source

Sarvam-30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o1 was released on 2024-12-17, while Sarvam-30B was released on 2026-03-06.

Sarvam-30B is 15 months newer than o1.

o1

Dec 17, 2024

1.2 years ago

Sarvam-30B

Mar 6, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (78.0% vs 66.5%)
Higher MMLU score (91.8% vs 85.1%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (41.0% vs 34.0%)
Has open weights
Higher HumanEval score (92.1% vs 88.1%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
o1
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-30B