o1-preview vs Qwen2 72B Instruct Comparison

Comparing o1-preview and Qwen2 72B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

o1-preview outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMLU), while Qwen2 72B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

o1-preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
o1-preview
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o1-preview specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only o1-preview specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

OpenAI
o1-preview
Input128,000 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

o1-preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2 72B Instruct uses tongyi-qianwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o1-preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2 72B Instruct

tongyi-qianwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o1-preview was released on 2024-09-12, while Qwen2 72B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23.

o1-preview is 2 months newer than Qwen2 72B Instruct.

o1-preview

Sep 12, 2024

1.5 years ago

1mo newer
Qwen2 72B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (73.3% vs 42.4%)
Higher MATH score (85.5% vs 59.7%)
Higher MMLU score (90.8% vs 82.3%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2 72B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
o1-preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B Instruct