Model Comparison

o1-preview vs Qwen3 235B A22B

o1-preview shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Qwen3 235B A22B is 262.5x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

o1-preview outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MGSM, MMLU), while Qwen3 235B A22B is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, LiveBench).

o1-preview shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B costs less

For input processing, o1-preview ($15.00/1M tokens) is 150.0x more expensive than Qwen3 235B A22B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, o1-preview ($60.00/1M tokens) is 600.0x more expensive than Qwen3 235B A22B ($0.10/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o1-preview is more expensive than Qwen3 235B A22B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

o1-preview

Input tokens$15.00

Output tokens$60.00

Best providerOpenAI

Qwen3 235B A22B

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.10

Best providerFireworks

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while o1-preview is limited to 32,768 tokens.

o1-preview

Input128,000 tokens

Output32,768 tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

o1-preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 235B A22B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o1-preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o1-preview was released on 2024-09-12, while Qwen3 235B A22B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 235B A22B is 8 months newer than o1-preview.

o1-preview

Sep 12, 2024

1.7 years ago

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apr 29, 2025

1.0 years ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

o1-preview is available from OpenAI, Azure. Qwen3 235B A22B is available from Fireworks, DeepInfra, Novita, Together.

o1-preview

OpenAI

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M

Azure

Input Price:Input: $16.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $66.00/1M

Qwen3 235B A22B

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M

Together

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

o1-preview

View details

OpenAI

Higher GPQA score (73.3% vs 47.5%)

Higher MATH score (85.5% vs 71.8%)

Higher MGSM score (90.8% vs 83.5%)

Higher MMLU score (90.8% vs 87.8%)

Qwen3 235B A22B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Higher AIME 2024 score (85.7% vs 42.0%)

Higher LiveBench score (77.1% vs 52.3%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	o1-preview	Qwen3 235B A22B

FAQ

Common questions about o1-preview vs Qwen3 235B A22B.

Which is better, o1-preview or Qwen3 235B A22B?

o1-preview shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. o1-preview is made by OpenAI and Qwen3 235B A22B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does o1-preview compare to Qwen3 235B A22B in benchmarks?

o1-preview scores MGSM: 90.8%, MMLU: 90.8%, MATH: 85.5%, GPQA: 73.3%, LiveBench: 52.3%. Qwen3 235B A22B scores Arena Hard: 95.6%, GSM8k: 94.4%, BBH: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.8%, MMLU-Redux: 87.4%.

Is o1-preview cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B?

Qwen3 235B A22B is 150.0x cheaper for input tokens. o1-preview costs $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output via openai. Qwen3 235B A22B costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output via fireworks.

What are the context window sizes for o1-preview and Qwen3 235B A22B?

o1-preview supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 235B A22B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o1-preview and Qwen3 235B A22B?

Key differences include input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.10/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes o1-preview and Qwen3 235B A22B?

o1-preview is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 235B A22B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.