Model Comparison

o1-pro vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

o1-pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
o1-pro
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

o1-pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 32B Instruct does not.

o1-pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

o1-pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

o1-pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o1-pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o1-pro was released on 2024-12-17, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

o1-pro is 3 months newer than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

o1-pro

Dec 17, 2024

1.3 years ago

2mo newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o1-pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-09-30, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o1-pro's training data extends to 2023-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

o1-pro

Sep 2023

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (79.0% vs 49.5%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
o1-pro
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about o1-pro vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. o1-pro is made by OpenAI and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
o1-pro scores AIME 2024: 86.0%, GPQA: 79.0%. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.9%, HumanEval: 88.4%, HellaSwag: 85.2%, BBH: 84.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
o1-pro is developed by OpenAI and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.