Model Comparison

o3 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

o3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 7.2x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

o3 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, Tau2 Airline, Tau2 Retail, Tau2 Telecom), while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025).

o3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat May 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking costs less

For input processing, o3 ($2.00/1M tokens) is 13.3x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, o3 ($8.00/1M tokens) is 5.3x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($1.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o3 is more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat May 30 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
o3
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$8.00
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

o3 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's 65,536 tokens. o3 can generate longer responses up to 100,000 tokens, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is limited to 65,536 tokens.

OpenAI
o3
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input65,536 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Sat May 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

o3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking does not.

o3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

o3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

o3 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o3

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o3 was released on 2025-04-16, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking was released on 2025-09-10.

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 5 months newer than o3.

o3

Apr 16, 2025

1.1 years ago

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Sep 10, 2025

8 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o3 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o3's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's cutoff date.

o3

May 2024

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

—

Provider Availability

o3 is available from OpenAI. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is available from Novita.

o3

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (83.3% vs 77.2%)
Higher Tau2 Airline score (64.8% vs 60.5%)
Higher Tau2 Retail score (80.2% vs 67.8%)
Higher Tau2 Telecom score (58.2% vs 43.9%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher AIME 2025 score (87.8% vs 86.4%)
OpenAIo3
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
o3
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about o3 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.

Which is better, o3 or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

o3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. o3 is made by OpenAI and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does o3 compare to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking in benchmarks?

o3 scores COLLIE: 98.4%, AIME 2024: 91.6%, ARC-AGI: 88.0%, MathVista: 86.8%, AIME 2025: 86.4%. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking scores MMLU-Redux: 92.5%, IFEval: 88.9%, AIME 2025: 87.8%, WritingBench: 84.6%, MMLU-Pro: 82.7%.

Is o3 cheaper than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 13.3x cheaper for input tokens. o3 costs $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output via openai. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking costs $0.15/M input and $1.50/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for o3 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

o3 supports 200K tokens and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking supports 66K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o3 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 66K), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.15/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes o3 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

o3 is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.