Model Comparison
o3-mini vs Claude Opus 4Which is better in 2026?
Claude Opus 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. o3-mini is 15.6x cheaper per token.
Verdict: o3-mini vs Claude Opus 4 — which is better?
o3-mini (by OpenAI) and Claude Opus 4 (by Anthropic) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
o3-mini outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Claude Opus 4 is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified, TAU-bench Airline, TAU-bench Retail). Claude Opus 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, o3-mini is roughly 15.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Choose o3-mini if…
- cost matters — it's about 15.6x cheaper per token
Choose Claude Opus 4 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
o3-mini outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Claude Opus 4 is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified, TAU-bench Airline, TAU-bench Retail).
Claude Opus 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, o3-mini ($1.10/1M tokens) is 13.6x cheaper than Claude Opus 4 ($15.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, o3-mini ($4.40/1M tokens) is 17.0x cheaper than Claude Opus 4 ($75.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 4 is more expensive than o3-mini.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 200,000 tokens. o3-mini can generate longer responses up to 100,000 tokens, while Claude Opus 4 is limited to 32,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas o3-mini does not.
Claude Opus 4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
o3-mini
Claude Opus 4
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
o3-mini was released on 2025-01-30, while Claude Opus 4 was released on 2025-05-22.
Claude Opus 4 is 4 months newer than o3-mini.
Jan 30, 2025
1.5 years ago
May 22, 2025
1.1 years ago
3mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
o3-mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-09-30, while Claude Opus 4's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm o3-mini's training data extends to 2023-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Opus 4's cutoff date.
Sep 2023
—
Provider Availability
o3-mini is available from Azure, OpenAI. Claude Opus 4 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google.
o3-mini
Claude Opus 4
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
o3-mini
View detailsOpenAI
Claude Opus 4
View detailsAnthropic
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against o3-mini and Claude Opus 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about o3-mini vs Claude Opus 4.