Model Comparison

o3-mini vs o1-mini

o3-mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. o3-mini is 2.7x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

o3-mini outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU), while o1-mini is better at 0 benchmarks.

o3-mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

o3-mini costs less

For input processing, o3-mini ($1.10/1M tokens) is 2.7x cheaper than o1-mini ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, o3-mini ($4.40/1M tokens) is 2.7x cheaper than o1-mini ($12.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o1-mini is more expensive than o3-mini.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
o3-mini
Input tokens$1.10
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerAzure
OpenAI
o1-mini
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$12.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

o3-mini accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to o1-mini's 128,000 tokens. o3-mini can generate longer responses up to 100,000 tokens, while o1-mini is limited to 65,536 tokens.

OpenAI
o3-mini
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
OpenAI
o1-mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

o3-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

o1-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o3-mini was released on 2025-01-30, while o1-mini was released on 2024-09-12.

o3-mini is 5 months newer than o1-mini.

o3-mini

Jan 30, 2025

1.2 years ago

4mo newer
o1-mini

Sep 12, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o3-mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-09-30, while o1-mini's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o3-mini's training data extends to 2023-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without o1-mini's cutoff date.

o3-mini

Sep 2023

o1-mini

Provider Availability

o3-mini is available from Azure, OpenAI. o1-mini is available from OpenAI, Azure.

o3-mini

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $1.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M

o1-mini

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $12.00/1M
azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $3.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $13.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (77.2% vs 60.0%)
Higher MMLU score (86.9% vs 85.2%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
o3-mini
OpenAI
o1-mini

FAQ

Common questions about o3-mini vs o1-mini

o3-mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. o3-mini is made by OpenAI and o1-mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
o3-mini scores COLLIE: 98.7%, MATH: 97.9%, IFEval: 93.9%, MGSM: 92.0%, AIME 2024: 87.3%. o1-mini scores HumanEval: 92.4%, MATH-500: 90.0%, MMLU: 85.2%, SuperGLUE: 75.0%, GPQA: 60.0%.
o3-mini is 2.7x cheaper for input tokens. o3-mini costs $1.10/M input and $4.40/M output via azure. o1-mini costs $3.00/M input and $12.00/M output via openai.
o3-mini supports 200K tokens and o1-mini supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($1.10 vs $3.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.