Model Comparison

o3-mini vs Qwen2 7B Instruct

o3-mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

o3-mini outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMLU), while Qwen2 7B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

o3-mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
o3-mini
Input tokens$1.10
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerAzure
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 7B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o3-mini specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o3-mini specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

OpenAI
o3-mini
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

o3-mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o3-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o3-mini was released on 2025-01-30, while Qwen2 7B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23.

o3-mini is 6 months newer than Qwen2 7B Instruct.

o3-mini

Jan 30, 2025

1.2 years ago

6mo newer
Qwen2 7B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o3-mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-09-30, while Qwen2 7B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o3-mini's training data extends to 2023-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2 7B Instruct's cutoff date.

o3-mini

Sep 2023

Qwen2 7B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (77.2% vs 25.3%)
Higher MATH score (97.9% vs 49.6%)
Higher MMLU score (86.9% vs 70.5%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
o3-mini
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 7B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about o3-mini vs Qwen2 7B Instruct

o3-mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. o3-mini is made by OpenAI and Qwen2 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
o3-mini scores COLLIE: 98.7%, MATH: 97.9%, IFEval: 93.9%, MGSM: 92.0%, AIME 2024: 87.3%. Qwen2 7B Instruct scores MT-Bench: 84.1%, GSM8k: 82.3%, HumanEval: 79.9%, C-Eval: 77.2%, AlignBench: 72.1%.
o3-mini supports 200K tokens and Qwen2 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
o3-mini is developed by OpenAI and Qwen2 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.