o3-mini vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Comparison

Comparing o3-mini and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

o3-mini outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, Multi-Challenge, SWE-Bench Verified).

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs less

For input processing, o3-mini ($1.10/1M tokens) is 2.8x more expensive than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ($0.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, o3-mini ($4.40/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o3-mini is more expensive than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
o3-mini
Input tokens$1.10
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerAzure
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to o3-mini's 200,000 tokens. o3-mini can generate longer responses up to 100,000 tokens, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is limited to 64,000 tokens.

OpenAI
o3-mini
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Input262,144 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports multimodal inputs, whereas o3-mini does not.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

o3-mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

o3-mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o3-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o3-mini was released on 2025-01-30, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B was released on 2026-02-24.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is 13 months newer than o3-mini.

o3-mini

Jan 30, 2025

1.1 years ago

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Feb 24, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o3-mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-09-30, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o3-mini's training data extends to 2023-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's cutoff date.

o3-mini

Sep 2023

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Provider Availability

o3-mini is available from Azure, OpenAI. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is available from Novita. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

o3-mini

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $1.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher IFEval score (93.9% vs 93.4%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (86.6% vs 77.2%)
Higher Multi-Challenge score (61.5% vs 39.9%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (72.0% vs 49.3%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
o3-mini
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B