Model Comparison

o3-pro vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Comparing o3-pro and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

o3-pro and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o3-pro specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o3-pro specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

o3-pro

Input200,000 tokens

Output100,000 tokens

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Input- tokens

Output- tokens

Tue May 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both o3-pro and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

o3-pro

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

o3-pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o3-pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o3-pro was released on 2025-06-10, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 3 months newer than o3-pro.

o3-pro

Jun 10, 2025

11 months ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o3-pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o3-pro's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

o3-pro

May 2024

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

o3-pro

View details

OpenAI

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	o3-pro	Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about o3-pro vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, o3-pro or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

o3-pro (OpenAI) and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does o3-pro compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.

What are the context window sizes for o3-pro and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

o3-pro supports 200K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o3-pro and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes o3-pro and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

o3-pro is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.