Model Comparison

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Phi 4Which is better in 2026?

Phi 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Phi 4 is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Phi 4 — which is better?

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct (by Microsoft) and Phi 4 (by Microsoft) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Phi 4 is better at 7 benchmarks (Arena Hard, GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MGSM, MMLU, MMLU-Pro). Phi 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Phi 4 is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct also accepts a larger context window (128,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Phi-3.5-mini-instruct if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 128,000 token context window

Choose Phi 4 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 7 of 7 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Phi 4 is better at 7 benchmarks (Arena Hard, GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MGSM, MMLU, MMLU-Pro).

Phi 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jun 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Phi 4 costs less

For input processing, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct ($0.10/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than Phi 4 ($0.07/1M tokens).

For output processing, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct ($0.10/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than Phi 4 ($0.14/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is more expensive than Phi 4.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Jun 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.10
Best providerAzure
Microsoft
Phi 4
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.14
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

10.9B diff

Phi 4 has 10.9B more parameters than Phi-3.5-mini-instruct, making it 286.8% larger.

Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
3.8Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4
14.7Bparameters
3.8B
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
14.7B
Phi 4

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to Phi 4's 16,000 tokens. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Phi 4 is limited to 16,000 tokens.

Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4
Input16,000 tokens
Output16,000 tokens
Tue Jun 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Phi 4

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct was released on 2024-08-23, while Phi 4 was released on 2024-12-12.

Phi 4 is 4 months newer than Phi-3.5-mini-instruct.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

1.8 years ago

Phi 4

Dec 12, 2024

1.5 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Phi-3.5-mini-instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Phi-3.5-mini-instruct's cutoff date.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

Phi 4

Jun 2024

Provider Availability

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is available from Azure. Phi 4 is available from DeepInfra.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M

Phi 4

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.14/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Less expensive output tokens
Less expensive input tokens
Higher Arena Hard score (75.4% vs 37.0%)
Higher GPQA score (56.1% vs 30.4%)
Higher HumanEval score (82.6% vs 62.8%)
Higher MATH score (80.4% vs 48.5%)
Higher MGSM score (80.6% vs 47.9%)
Higher MMLU score (84.8% vs 69.0%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (70.4% vs 47.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Microsoft
Phi 4

FAQ

Common questions about Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Phi 4.

Which is better, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct or Phi 4?

Phi 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is made by Microsoft and Phi 4 is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Phi-3.5-mini-instruct compare to Phi 4 in benchmarks?

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct scores GSM8k: 86.2%, ARC-C: 84.6%, RULER: 84.1%, PIQA: 81.0%, OpenBookQA: 79.2%. Phi 4 scores MMLU: 84.8%, HumanEval+: 82.8%, HumanEval: 82.6%, MGSM: 80.6%, MATH: 80.4%.

Is Phi-3.5-mini-instruct cheaper than Phi 4?

Phi 4 is 1.4x cheaper for input tokens. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output via azure. Phi 4 costs $0.07/M input and $0.14/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Phi-3.5-mini-instruct and Phi 4?

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct supports 128K tokens and Phi 4 supports 16K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi-3.5-mini-instruct and Phi 4?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 16K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $0.07/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.