The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct vs Qwen3.8-27B

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Microsoft · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.8-27B

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
Released
Aug 2024
Aug 2026
License
MIT
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

32.2B diff

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct has 32.2B more parameters than Qwen3.8-27B, making it 116.0% larger.

Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
60.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
27.8Bparameters
60.0B
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
27.8B
Qwen3.8-27B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.8-27B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct does not.

Qwen3.8-27B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3.8-27B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3.8-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct was released on 2024-08-23, while Qwen3.8-27B was released on 2026-08-14.

Qwen3.8-27B is 24 months newer than Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

2.0 years ago

Qwen3.8-27B

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

2.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct and Qwen3.8-27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-27B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct vs Qwen3.8-27B.

Which is better, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct or Qwen3.8-27B?

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is made by Microsoft and Qwen3.8-27B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct compare to Qwen3.8-27B in benchmarks?

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct scores ARC-C: 91.0%, OpenBookQA: 89.6%, GSM8k: 88.7%, PIQA: 88.6%, RULER: 87.1%. Qwen3.8-27B scores MathVision: 94.6%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 90.3%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, GPQA: 89.2%.

What are the main differences between Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct and Qwen3.8-27B?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct and Qwen3.8-27B?

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3.8-27B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.