The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 1.9.

Microsoft · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8 Max leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 1.9, ranking #11 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8 Max wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.8 Max

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.9 and ranks #11 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
1.9
#317
51.9
#11
1.4
#310
50.6
#11
-3.8
#253
39.6
#14
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
$1.65 / M
Output price
— / M
$4.95 / M
Context window
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Qwen3.8 Max
4.3#284
33.8#52
8.2#86
30.1#4
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct · 42 for Qwen3.8 Max

1 shared

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8 Max is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3.8 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2340.0B diff

Qwen3.8 Max has 2340.0B more parameters than Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct, making it 3900.0% larger.

Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
60.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Max
2.4Tparameters
60.0B
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
2400.0B
Qwen3.8 Max

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.8 Max specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Qwen3.8 Max specifies output context (256,000 tokens).

Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Max
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8 Max supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct does not.

Qwen3.8 Max can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3.8 Max uses Qwen3.8-Max License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8-Max License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct was released on 2024-08-23, while Qwen3.8 Max was released on 2026-08-02.

Qwen3.8 Max is 24 months newer than Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

2.1 years ago

Qwen3.8 Max

Aug 2, 2026

1 months ago

1.9yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct and Qwen3.8 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Max
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max.

Which is better, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct or Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 1.9. Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is made by Microsoft and Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct compare to Qwen3.8 Max in benchmarks?

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct scores ARC-C: 91.0%, OpenBookQA: 89.6%, GSM8k: 88.7%, PIQA: 88.6%, RULER: 87.1%. Qwen3.8 Max scores PaperBench: 93.0%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 92.9%, GPQA: 92.6%, VideoMME w sub.: 90.4%, RealWorldQA: 88.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct and Qwen3.8 Max?

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.8 Max supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct and Qwen3.8 Max?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (1.9 vs 51.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Qwen3.8-Max License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct and Qwen3.8 Max?

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3.8 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.