Model Comparison

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is 6.4x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Phi-4-multimodal-instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking — which is better?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct (by Microsoft) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct outperforms in 1 benchmarks (OCRBench), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 4 benchmarks (AI2D, BLINK, MMMU-Pro, Video-MME). Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is roughly 6.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Phi-4-multimodal-instruct if…

  • cost matters — it's about 6.4x cheaper per token

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 5 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct outperforms in 1 benchmarks (OCRBench), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 4 benchmarks (AI2D, BLINK, MMMU-Pro, Video-MME).

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct costs less

For input processing, Phi-4-multimodal-instruct ($0.05/1M tokens) is 4.0x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Phi-4-multimodal-instruct ($0.10/1M tokens) is 9.9x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.99/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is more expensive than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
Microsoft
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Input tokens$0.05
Output tokens$0.10
Best providerDeepinfra
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.99
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

25.4B diff

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has 25.4B more parameters than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct, making it 453.6% larger.

Microsoft
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
5.6Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
31.0Bparameters
5.6B
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Phi-4-multimodal-instruct's 128,000 tokens. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is limited to 32,768 tokens.

Microsoft
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct was released on 2025-02-01, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 8 months newer than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Feb 1, 2025

1.5 years ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

9 months ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi-4-multimodal-instruct's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's cutoff date.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Jun 2024

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Provider Availability

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is available from DeepInfra. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is available from Novita, DeepInfra.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.05/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.29/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.99/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher OCRBench score (84.4% vs 83.9%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Higher AI2D score (86.9% vs 82.3%)
Higher BLINK score (65.4% vs 61.3%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (63.0% vs 38.5%)
Higher Video-MME score (73.3% vs 55.0%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Phi-4-multimodal-instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

Which is better, Phi-4-multimodal-instruct or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is made by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Phi-4-multimodal-instruct compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking in benchmarks?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct scores ScienceQA Visual: 97.5%, DocVQA: 93.2%, MMBench: 86.7%, POPE: 85.6%, OCRBench: 84.4%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, MMLU-Redux: 90.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.6%.

Is Phi-4-multimodal-instruct cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is 4.0x cheaper for input tokens. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct costs $0.05/M input and $0.10/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs $0.20/M input and $0.99/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.05 vs $0.20/M), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.