Model Comparison

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507Which is better in 2026?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Phi 4 Reasoning Plus vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 — which is better?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus (by Microsoft) and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, IFEval, MMLU-Pro). Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning Plus if…

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

Choose Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, IFEval, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

221.0B diff

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 has 221.0B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus, making it 1578.6% larger.

Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
14.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
235.0Bparameters
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
235.0B
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Input262,144 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sat Jun 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus was released on 2025-04-30, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 was released on 2025-07-25.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 3 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Apr 30, 2025

1.2 years ago

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Jul 25, 2025

11 months ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning Plus's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507's cutoff date.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Mar 2025

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Higher AIME 2025 score (92.3% vs 78.0%)
Higher GPQA score (81.1% vs 68.9%)
Higher IFEval score (87.8% vs 84.9%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (84.4% vs 76.0%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Phi 4 Reasoning Plus vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507.

Which is better, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is made by Microsoft and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Phi 4 Reasoning Plus compare to Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 in benchmarks?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus scores FlenQA: 97.9%, HumanEval+: 92.3%, IFEval: 84.9%, OmniMath: 81.9%, AIME 2024: 81.3%. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.8%, AIME 2025: 92.3%, WritingBench: 88.3%, IFEval: 87.8%, Creative Writing v3: 86.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Key differences include licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.