Model Comparison

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat May 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

17.0B diff

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has 17.0B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus, making it 121.4% larger.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

14.0Bparameters

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

31.0Bparameters

14.0B

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

31.0B

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Input- tokens

Output- tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Input131,072 tokens

Output32,768 tokens

Sat May 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning Plus does not.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus was released on 2025-04-30, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 5 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Apr 30, 2025

1.1 years ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning Plus's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's cutoff date.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Mar 2025

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

View details

Microsoft

Higher IFEval score (84.9% vs 81.7%)

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Higher AIME 2025 score (83.1% vs 78.0%)

Higher GPQA score (74.4% vs 68.9%)

Higher MMLU-Pro score (80.5% vs 76.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Phi 4 Reasoning Plus	Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Phi 4 Reasoning Plus vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

Which is better, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is made by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Phi 4 Reasoning Plus compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking in benchmarks?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus scores FlenQA: 97.9%, HumanEval+: 92.3%, IFEval: 84.9%, OmniMath: 81.9%, AIME 2024: 81.3%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, MMLU-Redux: 90.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.