Model Comparison

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, IFEval, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat May 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

19.0B diff

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has 19.0B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus, making it 135.7% larger.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

14.0Bparameters

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

33.0Bparameters

14.0B

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

33.0B

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning Plus does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus was released on 2025-04-30, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is 5 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Apr 30, 2025

1.0 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

7 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning Plus's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking's cutoff date.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Mar 2025

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

View details

Microsoft

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs

Higher AIME 2025 score (83.7% vs 78.0%)

Higher GPQA score (73.1% vs 68.9%)

Higher IFEval score (87.8% vs 84.9%)

Higher MMLU-Pro score (82.1% vs 76.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Phi 4 Reasoning Plus	Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Phi 4 Reasoning Plus vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Which is better, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is made by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Phi 4 Reasoning Plus compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking in benchmarks?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus scores FlenQA: 97.9%, HumanEval+: 92.3%, IFEval: 84.9%, OmniMath: 81.9%, AIME 2024: 81.3%. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%.

What are the main differences between Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.