Model Comparison

QvQ-72B-Preview vs Qwen3 VL 32B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: QvQ-72B-Preview vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking — which is better?

QvQ-72B-Preview (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

QvQ-72B-Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (MathVision). Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose QvQ-72B-Preview if…

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

QvQ-72B-Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (MathVision).

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

40.4B diff

QvQ-72B-Preview has 40.4B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking, making it 122.4% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
73.4Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
33.0Bparameters
73.4B
QvQ-72B-Preview
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both QvQ-72B-Preview and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

QvQ-72B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

QvQ-72B-Preview is licensed under Qwen, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

QvQ-72B-Preview

Qwen

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

QvQ-72B-Preview was released on 2024-12-25, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is 9 months newer than QvQ-72B-Preview.

QvQ-72B-Preview

Dec 25, 2024

1.5 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

QvQ-72B-Preview

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher MathVision score (70.2% vs 35.9%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about QvQ-72B-Preview vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Which is better, QvQ-72B-Preview or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. QvQ-72B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does QvQ-72B-Preview compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking in benchmarks?

QvQ-72B-Preview scores MathVista: 71.4%, MMMU: 70.3%, MathVision: 35.9%, OlympiadBench: 20.4%. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%.

What are the main differences between QvQ-72B-Preview and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Key differences include licensing (Qwen vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.