Model Comparison

QvQ-72B-Preview vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

QvQ-72B-Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (MathVision).

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 28 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

69.4B diff

QvQ-72B-Preview has 69.4B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking, making it 1735.0% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
73.4Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking
4.0Bparameters
73.4B
QvQ-72B-Preview
4.0B
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Apr 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both QvQ-72B-Preview and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

QvQ-72B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

QvQ-72B-Preview is licensed under Qwen, while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

QvQ-72B-Preview

Qwen

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

QvQ-72B-Preview was released on 2024-12-25, while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is 9 months newer than QvQ-72B-Preview.

QvQ-72B-Preview

Dec 25, 2024

1.3 years ago

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

7 months ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

QvQ-72B-Preview

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Higher MathVision score (60.0% vs 35.9%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about QvQ-72B-Preview vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. QvQ-72B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
QvQ-72B-Preview scores MathVista: 71.4%, MMMU: 70.3%, MathVision: 35.9%, OlympiadBench: 20.4%. Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 94.2%, ScreenSpot: 92.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 86.7%, MMLU-Redux: 86.0%, AI2D: 84.9%.
QvQ-72B-Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Qwen vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.