The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

QvQ-72B-Preview vs Qwen3.8-27B

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

QvQ-72B-Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 1 benchmark (MathVision). Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose QvQ-72B-Preview

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.8-27B

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

QvQ-72B-Preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—
Released
Dec 2024
Aug 2026
License
Qwen
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

QvQ-72B-Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 1 benchmark (MathVision).

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

45.6B diff

QvQ-72B-Preview has 45.6B more parameters than Qwen3.8-27B, making it 164.2% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
73.4Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
27.8Bparameters
73.4B
QvQ-72B-Preview
27.8B
Qwen3.8-27B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both QvQ-72B-Preview and Qwen3.8-27B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

QvQ-72B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

QvQ-72B-Preview is licensed under Qwen, while Qwen3.8-27B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

QvQ-72B-Preview

Qwen

Open weights

Qwen3.8-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

QvQ-72B-Preview was released on 2024-12-25, while Qwen3.8-27B was released on 2026-08-14.

Qwen3.8-27B is 20 months newer than QvQ-72B-Preview.

QvQ-72B-Preview

Dec 25, 2024

1.7 years ago

Qwen3.8-27B

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.6yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against QvQ-72B-Preview and Qwen3.8-27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

QvQ-72B-Preview
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-27B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about QvQ-72B-Preview vs Qwen3.8-27B.

Which is better, QvQ-72B-Preview or Qwen3.8-27B?

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. QvQ-72B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3.8-27B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does QvQ-72B-Preview compare to Qwen3.8-27B in benchmarks?

QvQ-72B-Preview scores MathVista: 71.4%, MMMU: 70.3%, MathVision: 35.9%, OlympiadBench: 20.4%. Qwen3.8-27B scores MathVision: 94.6%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 90.3%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, GPQA: 89.2%.

What are the main differences between QvQ-72B-Preview and Qwen3.8-27B?

Key differences include licensing (Qwen vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons