Model Comparison

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

8 benchmarks

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct outperforms in 8 benchmarks (GPQA, GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MBPP, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux, MultiPL-E), while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

7.7B diff

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 7.7B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B, making it 110.0% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
14.7Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
7.0Bparameters
14.7B
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is 6 months newer than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.1 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher GPQA score (45.5% vs 30.8%)
Higher GSM8k score (94.8% vs 88.7%)
Higher HumanEval score (83.5% vs 78.7%)
Higher MATH score (80.0% vs 71.5%)
Higher MBPP score (82.0% vs 73.2%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (63.7% vs 47.0%)
Higher MMLU-Redux score (80.0% vs 71.0%)
Higher MultiPL-E score (72.8% vs 65.8%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores GSM8k: 94.8%, HumanEval: 83.5%, MBPP: 82.0%, MATH: 80.0%, MMLU-Redux: 80.0%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%, ChartQA: 85.3%.
Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.