The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct vs Qwen3.8-27B

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.8-27B

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—
Released
Sep 2024
Aug 2026
License
Apache 2.0
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

4.7B diff

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 4.7B more parameters than Qwen3.8-27B, making it 17.0% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
32.5Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
27.8Bparameters
32.5B
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
27.8B
Qwen3.8-27B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.8-27B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 32B Instruct does not.

Qwen3.8-27B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.8-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19, while Qwen3.8-27B was released on 2026-08-14.

Qwen3.8-27B is 23 months newer than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.9 years ago

Qwen3.8-27B

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.9yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen2.5 32B Instruct and Qwen3.8-27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-27B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5 32B Instruct vs Qwen3.8-27B.

Which is better, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct or Qwen3.8-27B?

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3.8-27B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen2.5 32B Instruct compare to Qwen3.8-27B in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.9%, HumanEval: 88.4%, HellaSwag: 85.2%, BBH: 84.5%, MBPP: 84.0%. Qwen3.8-27B scores MathVision: 94.6%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 90.3%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, GPQA: 89.2%.

What are the main differences between Qwen2.5 32B Instruct and Qwen3.8-27B?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons