Model Comparison

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 30B A3B is 2.4x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 4 benchmarks (Arena Hard, GPQA, LiveBench, LiveCodeBench).

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

For input processing, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.35/1M tokens) is 3.5x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.40/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input tokens$0.35
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

42.2B diff

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 42.2B more parameters than Qwen3 30B A3B, making it 138.4% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
72.7Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
30.5Bparameters
72.7B
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
30.5B
Qwen3 30B A3B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Qwen3 30B A3B's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is licensed under Qwen, while Qwen3 30B A3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen

Open weights

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 30B A3B is 7 months newer than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apr 29, 2025

1.0 years ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks, Together. Qwen3 30B A3B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.35/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Qwen3 30B A3B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 30B A3B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher Arena Hard score (91.0% vs 81.2%)
Higher GPQA score (65.8% vs 49.0%)
Higher LiveBench score (74.3% vs 52.3%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (62.6% vs 55.5%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 30B A3B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.8%, MT-Bench: 93.5%, MBPP: 88.2%, MMLU-Redux: 86.8%, HumanEval: 86.6%. Qwen3 30B A3B scores Arena Hard: 91.0%, AIME 2024: 80.4%, LiveBench: 74.3%, Multi-IF: 72.2%, AIME 2025: 70.9%.
Qwen3 30B A3B is 3.5x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.35/M input and $0.40/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (131K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.35 vs $0.10/M), licensing (Qwen vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.